10-31
Saturday, November 18, 2006
who's he going to call?
For how long are the turgid incoherent presentations from batboy going to continue?
10-31
Spare us the dramatic screenplay, Joe.
"Tell that to guys who are in two combat theatres", he says. As if he cares about anyone in any theater except if he's standing at a microphone! Hypocrisy, is what they call this, Joe, but it goes a long way to demonstrate how dishonest and purposely misleading you are with the world around you.You're so far out of touch with reality, you think that you can keep telling these far-fetched stories, you can keep making up malicious lies about people and spreading them all across the internet--and nobody will stop you!
Nobody is even interested in your latest venture...nobody at all.
10-31
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
June 2006
Plotters Meeting June 2, 2006?
10-31
Tiffany Twisted is a little girl named Amber?
So weird.
With what was in the description of the blog, and the picture, it reminded several of us of not only Joe Cafasso, but of the entire 'cabal' that Pelton described in his book. And what is someone doing here and elsewhere in the middle of the night? Don't these kids have anything better to do with their time than to hit blogs about Joe Cafasso?
Maybe she should take the Cafasso references out of the description of the blog...instead of baiting all those people out there who are curious and following the story behind the scenes.
So we hope that her 'feed' starts to work, and that her little friends can catch up with her. We extend our apologies.
10-31
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
nothing much to add except this
This just popped out today in the google search engine.
Tiffany Twisted: John R. Bolton Outed as Joe Cafasso; to Be Booted ...Devoted to Joe Cafasso aka Gerry Blackwood, Viktoria Robertson, Robert Gates, Jay Cafasso, ... Her mind is tiffany twisted. She's got her Mercedes Benz. ...
tiffany-twisted.blogspot.com/2006/
10-31
I like blogger beta
but I'm annoyed that the blogger toolbar has reappeared. I'm going to devise a hack for that and pass it on.
10-31
my apologies to Tiffany Amber
Or whatever the little girl's name is.
But there are lots of other references to Tiffany Twisted out there, one of them is "Hotel California".
10-31
Monday, November 13, 2006
Tiffany Twisted
Look at this.
Tiffany Twistedposted by Tiffany Twisted at 5:12 AM 0 comments. Devoted to Joe Cafasso aka Gerry Blackwood, Viktoria Robertson, David Reuther, Robert Gates, Jay Cafasso, ...
tiffany-twisted.blogspot.com/ - 14k - Nov 11, 2006 -
Is anyone close to him that is watching all of this going to tell him to stop, plead with him to be reasonable, or chastise him for his immature behavior? Or are we all just going to watch him implode?
It's truly a shame that this was all done on Columbia University's servers...
As someone said to me earlier...this is going to get messy.
10-31
Joe Cafasso is a busy, busy little bee
I noticed when looking through the readings that Cafasso's nose is particularly pulled out of joint over the recent occurrences online, and that he's trying hard to figure out who is doing this as people were trying to figure out his identity behind the Stuporpatriots blog for so long. The jig is up; he's on the run. Cramer's having a meltdown, Pelton is searching for his name...it really is getting quite interesting. All because the frauds and liars have been revealed for what they are. Not that this will prevent them from raking in the dough because their crowd doesn't care if Cafasso is Blackwood; they're happy to see he's a 'victim' of Fox. The ideology of journalists nowadays is so extreme that they don't even realize when they're talking that rhetoric about 'real reporting' that the 'real reporting' they're talking about has an ideology attached to it. Which is one of the reasons that blogs popped up to begin with.Cafasso doesn't th
ink he's going to ever be caught, so he started up a blog aimed at John Tiffany called "Tiffany-Twisted.blogspot.com". It has a great depiction of Cafasso's face, too. It's 'batboy', and it really shows how desperate the man has become. Which isn't all the original...Indymedia has used that image before. In some circles that might considered a joke; people might say that this is what a moonbat really looks like. Don't worry, Joe, we continue to monitor your progress in a number of areas. When you find out who we are, you can come and break our kneecaps for us...or better yet...threaten us on bossy recorded messages because you're so out-of-control and aren't getting your way. File frivolous complaints, call NSA, write notes to paypal, ebay, and whatever else you've threatened people with. Oh yeah, I forgot. The Capitol Police, too. For a man as old as Cafasso is, it's puzzling that he would act like such an immature child in so many instances when he doesn't get his way.
10-31
Sunday, November 12, 2006
Joe Cafasso; contrasting Stuporpatriots with Outfoxed
This is just the beginning. The following piece was written with the input from several sources and is the result of a collaboration between me and Causal Nexus. He has it up at Carteret Con Artist. There actually isn't that much of a contrast between Stuporpatriots and what Cafasso said at Outfoxed. Carteret Con Artist's post and mine are not completely identical, as we've both tweaked what we have up a little bit. The more we read of his rants, the more the writing style, the spelling errors, the same references to intelligence terms, the sadistic pleasure in peoples' misfortunes and his part in those misfortunes, is coming to the surface.
At his own blog Joe Cafasso bloviates, revealing the very sentiments he talked about in the short clip above in "outfoxed". This is just one example of it, but there are numerous examples over there. We deconstruct them for...LOLKICKS! Here is an illustration of what he briefly discussed in Outfoxed. Above you can see a clip of Cafasso when he appeared for a blink of a second in Outfoxed, don't blink or you might miss it! Thanks to all for the technical help on this, and of course Cao, who graciously gave us a telephone interview.
They Just Don't Get It!First, the sarcastic tone and calling Kender by another name is demonstrative of someone who is intent upon revealing someone's identity who hasn't chosen to reveal it. Another problem is his ignorance in the use of contractions. He uses "its" instead of "it's". He probably doesn't even understand the difference. These are skills that most people learn in gradeschool, but skills which Joe Cafasso missed out on. He must have been bullying some kid on the playground for his lunch money when they covered that in first grade. Another key problem he has is the spelling and use of similar-sounding words, such as there, their, they're. He doesn't use them in the correct places. And this man has been masquerading as a PHD in discussion groups and no one has noticed these little details.
DISCOURAGED FORWARD! Junior Cape Crusaders Worldwide and our new trusty-side kick Award Winning Journalist Ed Caraballo!
Well Junior Cape Crusaders we seem to have some e mails from JackLynn's wingnutosphere! No problem Bigdog it was our pleasure to provide you a link. We hope you feel the same way in a few days when we out you.
Now this one was very interesting and actually deserves a response.
From: Kender
To: stuporpatriotscommo@yahoo.com
Subject: [The Stupor Patriots!] 1/23/2006 09:52:48 PM
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Yeah....thanx for the link.....BTW, I am awaiting my "outing"......and why do you have a bunch of people in the list that aren't in the free jack blog group? Couldn't that ve construed as harassment?
--
Posted by Kender to The Stupor Patriots! at 1/23/2006 09:52:48 PM
No problem Don! Its coming!
We are very focused on you anyway and just this once we will play since you do raise a couple of questions worth answering. Why all of Wideawakes? And can it be construed as harassment?Notice his condescension over Cao at Cao's blog. He refers to her as "JackLynn" and calls her stupid. Cafasso, by all appearances, in spite of his objections, is very political, as his forced retirement from Fox would attest, in addition to his jumping on with the moveon.org crowd. These are simply lies. Spin minus facts? Let's see the evidence instead of the hyperbole. These aren't facts, these are generalizations.
Well now. To answer your first question. Wideawakes was not even on our radar screen until its psychotic founder JackLynn made it an issue. Dumb mistake. So of course we looked into the writings. Stupor Patriots is non-political and dedicated only to Jack Idema until his alter-ego jumped in. Of course we have our own opinions on politics and world events. Most of which we all believe is nothing more than spin minus a hell of a lot of facts at the expense of the US Constitution and the American Public.
Wideawakes adds to the sheeple factor just as its liberal counter-parts do. If you must know we here are Constitutionalists. Solid conservatives but with real world experience in matters of the beltway. We do deal with the liberal points of view in our own ways and in a matter of speaking very directly.This is an interesting observation, that conservatives - or maybe more succinctly, Christians, are considered "sheeple". Counter-part is one word and is not hyphenated, it's a compound word. Constitutionalists? You certainly must mean Russia's constitution, but then, you've never been out of the country, have you? This must have something to do with your close association with that Russian interpretor you've been bragging about.
Wideawakes are a group of anonymous writers who share one common thread.... stupidity... and in many cases are worse than their liberal counter-parts. Lets call it ...christiantics....a mixture of religion and political antics that says, we are right and you are wrong no matter what the facts may be. At least you can sandbag the liberals with facts.Despite their political affiliations, Christians are all stupid. Yet, I find no proof that anything he says regarding that group is true. Or is it Conservatives? Can you not be a Christian and be a liberal? This twisted logic is lost on me. I'm not certain exactly which he's discussing, since he's made another stupid generalization there - but - everyone is stupid but Joe Cafasso. This fits into the definition of a stalker, harrasser, and psychotic, all names which he's been called in the past, and all names that he calls other people to throw the focus off of himself. Not very clever, though, is it?
Most of Wideawakes have never been involved with Hill politics. Never attended meetings at Foggy Bottom or the Puzzle Palace. Never testified in front of a Congressional Committee and never been inside the beltway to see reality. But they project their own unfounded reality.This is another signature, the names he makes up his own little phrases for things. Like "back in the 'stan'". Nobody calls Afghanistan 'the stan' who's ever been there. Now "Hill politics" we might have heard of, but "Foggy Bottom" or the "Puzzle Palace"? This is where he tries to impress us with his references to the intelligence community.
"Foggy Bottom" is the neighborhood in DC where the State Dept is located. Years ago folks referred to the intel of State as Foggy Bottom; today people refer to State intel as "I & R" as in State's "Intelligence and Research". Most people just refer to State today as "State" OR "I & R" for the intel section. In some intel circles some may refer to "Foggy Bottom" as opposed to "Ft. Meade" which is NSA or "Langley" as in "CIA headquarters" in McLean Virginia.
Puzzle Palace is a book about the NSA that Bamford wrote in 1982.
We already know that you testified in front of a Congressional Committee as a the head of the insurance lobby and a special forces soldier, which, of course is a lie. Your 44 days in the army never qualified you as a special forces soldier, although it's part of what you lay claim to having done that you never did. So we surmise he's correct about these people - they are upstanding citizens who are offering their opinions on subjects that he doesn't feel they're qualified for because they're 'stupid' by virtue of them all being Christians. A sweeping claim which he provides no evidence for. They should have no right to speak about any subject because they're 'dumb' in his "expert" omnipotent Joe Cafasso opinion. I'd bet none of them lied about their identities the way Cafasso has as Gerry Blackwood. But that doesn't make them stupid, that makes them honest.
Lets give you a couple of examples.....There's that contraction issue once more, it's let's as in let us. That's right, they believe in giving murderers and rapists their just punishment. I've heard that Cafasso has a child, I wonder what gender. Any man who is a father, I would think, would want to see child molesters brought to justice. Some child molesters walk over the line when they're freed and become child molesting murderers. This doesn't seem to bother Cafasso, however. I'm not sure they're Bible thumpers, though, from what I can see there is not a lot of quoting bible verses over there, but that's just as a result of my perusing a few pages. Joe Cafasso claims he's not 'political', but he believes in the right to kill babies, and is against the death penalty, and is a champion for social justice and is against war. We've already seen all of this by his association with certain individuals, but to go so far as to say the Stuporpatriots is not a political blog and then make a venomous post in opposition to people who don't profess to hold his opinions on political issues, is simply absurd. But in the mind of a psychotic, the only person that matters in the world is the psychotic, so it shouldn't come as a surprise.
Jack Idema.... Now lets see.... All of Wideawakes are Christians...Bible thumping Christians or so they say. Pro-life...of course that does not mean anti-death penalty, or champions for social justice or believers in war as a last resort, supporters of the first amendment for all equally.....Just anti-abortion.
Personally, as you will see from the posts accumulated here, I'm not talking about much but Joe Cafasso and the fear he attempts at instilling in people with intimidation and other tactics. I don't express any sentiments one way or another about the war or anything else, as I leave that up to the 'experts', and I do not consider Cafasso to be one.
The rest they define.... So here we have Jack Idema who is anything but a Christian nor holds to any Christian beliefs and the last time that Jack went to Church was when he was Baptized....Now he gets hero type of support from this so-called Christian community even though the real facts say the reverse. Which is why JackLynn was convicted of 56 counts of wire fraud and why JackLynn is in jail right now. There is no grand conspiracy. Never was. While spinning his horsehocky is very Christian of you all. Its also very Christian of people to attack others they do not know just based one ones points of view without and common reference or basis in fact......Very Christian. Its also very Christian to re-write or should we say cut and paste distortions from Jacks site and verbally running off with the mouth... And we know YOU don't like it done to you! Right Lynn? Right Don? So why do it to others?What does Jack Idema's religious persuasion have to do with this discussion? Perhaps Cafasso needs to justify his tirade. His hatred of Jack Idema and his setting up that blog to attack him and anyone who might be in support of him is curious. His denials that he is Joe Cafasso is equally as incredulous. Jack Idema apparently hurt Cafasso in some way; Cafasso blames him for his job loss at Fox. Cafasso blames Idema for not being able to take credit for the tapes. $200 a week, is what he was earning with Fox, wasn't it? Or was it the damage that the NYT Rutenberg piece did to his reputation as a military analyst and counterterrorism expert? From what we can see, he has done quite a bit afterwards, being cited as a source in numerous articles, books and other pieces such as Shadow Company. So that expose didn't really do much in the end to harm his reputation; leftists love criminals; that's why they hold candlelight vigils for mass murderers sitting on death row. Naturally it's the 'humanist' position that Cafasso takes.
Lets take a look at War.... The Wideawakes group, a Christian group, are major supporters of this so-called war in Iraq. Why? Especially when their beliefs go against the Lausanne Covenant of 1974. Because they believe that George Bush is not just one of them but was Divinely placed into office? Don't get us wrong we also believe in taking out Saddam. However the problem we have is very simple. The order of battle in this war on terrorism was taken out of order. Meaning after Afghanistan, which we did not finish..Iran was the next logical target. Iran the "most active state sponsor of terrorism". You can go back to 1983 and you will find that 85% of the worlds terror attacks can be linked the Iranian MOIS and the QUDS Force. In 1998 MSIC (Missile Space and Intelligence Command) was screaming about the Iranian Shahab Ballistic Missile Systems. In 2001 MSIC was screaming about the pending deployment of the Shahab 3 and in July of 2003 Iran operationally deployed the system while this Administration did absolutely nothing. Matter of fact in 2001 Iranian Special Forces were in Herat, Afghanistan supporting a warlord by the name of Ismail Kahn going against Karazi and our own forces. Did we take them out? Nope.... Yeah lets blame it all on the intelligence community....This administration is not any better than the last one.I would assume that Wide Awakes Radio, Kender's project has done quite a bit to convince Joe he was way off the mark with his branding all of the Wide Awakes Christians. But he was fresh off of his tiny little tirade which launched him into being a movie star, the main point being the 'Christian rightwing'. "We're right, you're wrong, no matter what." A devastastingly stupid remark to have come out of the lips and rotten teeth of Joe Cafasso, the man who has lied his way into places he has no business being, only to profess expertise on the military and other issues that he simply doesn't have.
Not political, but talking about politics, and even in a backhanded sort of way, saying that Bush is as bad as Clinton was in terms of supporting the military. Did you get that, Joe? You can't keep your points straight, obviously.
Now Iran has the potential of going nuclear. Can we attack them now? Sure... Can we whoop'em? Sure... But the cost in American lives will be far greater now than before the Iraq war. Hell Baghdad is now called "Little Iran"... MOIS influence is strong in Afghanistan. Both this Administration and the Liberals say, Iran has nationalism! Hell since when did we ever care about the nationalism of an enemy? Bill Clinton bombed Yugoslavia. Did we care about its nationalism? We armed and supported the Muslims in Kosovo. Many of those are the same ones we are fighting today. But because this administration suffered for a bad case of cranial rectal inversion, American soldiers are caught in the middle of the pincer.....What an intolerable twit. What Cafasso would really like is 'no war'. He doesn't see what nationalism really is. In Iraq, the intellect of a 35-year old man is that of a gradeschool child, here. And why is that? Because of Saddam's nationalism. It's the way the Arabs keep control over the population; by keeping them uneducated and ignorant, their existences meager and poor. You can talk all you want comparing what you know to what people know who've actually been there, Joe. Talking about things you know little about except when you get emails from journalists in other countries, but they aren't without an agenda now, are they? You should get yourself a passport...but then mommy's not buying your train tickets anymore, and to our knowledge, she never footed the bill for you to take a plane anywhere. Have you ever even ridden on an airplane, Joe? We know you've claimed to be a pilot. That kind of expertise would have to be included if you're going to represent yourself as the propagandist for the Association of Retired Aviation Professionals.
Are we any safer now than prior to 911? Not by much! While there are mid-level executives in both law enforcement and intelligence that could fix our problems with one hand tied behind their backs... But they are not political animals. Once again never place all of your loyality with any false prophets....especially the political type.... Like Reagan said, trust but verify!As I said, not a political blog, but talking politics. You can't claim to be one and then go back on yourself, it's not consistent to those of us with rational minds. Not everyone displays the overwhelming tendency to lie. Ahh, but these points are lost on poor sick Joe Cafasso.
So that leads us the one of the main focuses on Wideawakes. Their lack of reality.... There is an old saying, "Never create your own limitations by taking the opinions of others and allowing those opinions to become yours without a common reference or basis in fact". Meaning do some real world research. Not the research as done by JackLynn.... real research...Not the duckspeak that Wideawakes adds to the dumbing of Americans. They are no better than their liberal counter-parts. Hence our decision to out....He's only proven thus far how out of touch he is. Doesn't he realize that if he's going to pontificate on something, he should at least provide us with an example? Nothing there but generalizations, which are peppered throughout the bombastic tirade.
Still he hasn't pointed out examples of their lack of reality, he's pointed out his own simply by what it is he's writing. Taking the opinions of others and allowing those opinions to become yours without a common reference or basis in fact? What an interesting sentence. You are assuming, then, that everyone in your path that doesn't agree with you doesn't have the right to state their opinion, and that they're stupid as a result. Furthermore, that no research is good research unless it's fabricated by you and your associates. This is all very revealing.
Now does that constitute harassment? Nope... We have not been in contact with most of them with exception of those who have been stupid enough to reply to us, Like you Don... But harassment is, forcing your beliefs on someone else to a point where that person feels life threatened and receives threats, like Steven Pearcy. While we do not like Mr. Percy's politics he has a constitutional right to free speech without the threat of violence. The Nazi's did things like that! The Communists did things like that! The KKK did things like that! That Don is harassment! That Don is Domestic Terrorism! Posting a Treason Contest and threatening the life of a sitting US Senator is not just harassment but its also a criminal act and Don... We don't think much of Senator Kerry's politics either. But death threats? That's not even funny. Very Christian!According to the law t constitutes harrassment, and it does in New York as well as other places like Illinois. But I suppose it depends on who's defining it. We asked Cao about the things that Joe is discussing in this last paragraph. It turns out to be rather hyperbolic. Stephen Pearcy is a man who is trying to make himself into a celebrity. That's just one point that Cafasso and Pearcy have in common. He lives in Berkley and has a house in Sacramento that he rents out, and has put horrible displays showing soldiers in effigy, and when outrage rises out of the community, he's looking for people to sue. According to his neighbor, Stephen Pearcy is wild about pursueing media coverage. huh. Just like Joe Cafasso! Pearcy will do things like stand on a street corner with a sign and yell at passing cars. We in Britain have people like that, also, they're called village idiots. He baits conservatives into doing something, and then sues them. He won, in fact, a $5,000 settlement because some military or former military person ripped down one of his displays. He's also responsible for an Anti-American art display that was put up at a public courthouse, paid by American tax dollars. He has also been known to say of US soldiers "I hope they all die". He was the first one to release Cao's personal information, (including a picture of her that was someone else) but Joe did Pearcy one better. Joe published an autotrack that not only held her personal information, but that of her relatives, inlaws, former inlaws, and neighbors at the past few residents she's lived at, with their phone numbers and partial social security numbers. Not content with that because blogger took the post down, incensed that he didn't get away with it and she was fighting back, he then took it one step further and began calling and sending letters to her employer, claiming she's blogging on company assets and company time. What's interesting to note is he's so out of touch with the working class person. It's easy to document what you've done on the days you've taken for personal time, which every employee is afforded. Cao is more than resourceful; she managed to get that post with her personal information on it taken down by filing a complaint with blogger, but it had already been up for a full 10 days. But this is the kind of people Cafasso and Pearcy are. If Pearcy is undergoing problems, it's because of what he's doing to people. Here's another example of it at Digger's Realm:
Read a first hand account of a phone call one blogger received from Stephen Pearcy over at Mark Butterworth's blog Sunny Days In Heaven. Here's an excerpt, go read the rest.But Cafasso leaves out the many confrontations Pearcy has forced online and in person in Sacramento. One day, just like Cafasso, Pearcy is going to cross the wrong individual. Pearcy, like Cafasso, is more than slightly off-center. He even made it into the museum of leftwing lunacy.
I have just received a phone call today at about 12:15 pm from Mr. Stephen Pearcy regarding this blog which I wrote March 9, 2005 about Mr. and Mrs. Pearcy who hung a soldier in effigy (twice) from the eaves of their home in Land Park in Sacramento. I also noted with links vulgar statements posted on Mr. Pearcy’s car.
In the call I received from Mr. Pearcy, he informed me that I am guilty of a "tortious interference with a business relationship" because I suggested that people who didn't like her private actions could email her employer.
He admitted in our conversation (which I'll admit to being more animated in response than he in his assertions where he played the typical passive/aggressor) that his wife had suffered no harm from my blog or that of anybody else's (yes, he disclosed that he is contacting a number of other bloggers in the same way as he was doing with me) in her business relationship and had in fact seen an increases in business since they went public with their sick actions (the Michael Moore effect I guess you should call it).
I asked him if he was contemplating a potential cause of action against me. Yes, if warranted, he responded in approximate terms.
Mark Butterworth also informs me that Eugene Volokh has personally given him some advice and help via email and that he has contacted Stephen Pearcy in regards to his threats of a lawsuit.
But even more importantly not one of the Wideawakes bloggers spoke out against any of this type of behavior. NOT ONE. Not one spoke out against the verbal attacks sponsored by JackLynn.... Most either supported or remained neutral rather than face peer presure.....Not one spoke against the behavior which we find very bothersome....like the threats....the verbal attacks....So Hence the outing.....The appropriate spelling of that word is 'pressure', not that you would be familiar with a dictionary.
So Don if you or any of the Wideawakes blogger feel offended....all we have to say is..... "They sow the wind and reap the whirlwind".... And we are the whirlwind that you all helped create.......
BTW Don.... here is a PS for you... "The hottest places in hell are reserved for those in the course of a moral crisis remain neutral".... Dante
Five Days, 12 Hours, 36 Minutes to the OUTING!
DISCOURAGED FORWARD!
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality - Dante
I haven't seen verbal attacks out of Lynn over at Cao's blog. But notice how he just says those things without providing links or any information to back up what he says. We're supposed to believe this anonymous windbag, until we realize he's Joe Cafasso the windbag, and then it just becomes fodder for a hearty laugh. What I have seen is thought provoking posts from a point of view rarely heard from, except on the blogs, which I find to be refreshing. That's how I was pulled into all of this to begin with; I, too wanted to express my opinion about something that hasn't been covered except by one or two people who paid dearly for it, because Joe desperately wants to maintain his 'image', even if it's a fake one.
The Wide Awakes haven't spoken about her behavior because she hasn't done what you're accusing her of. In reality, the real quote is
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality - Dante
But what would he know about it, he already lives in hell-the Senton Hotel. He also uses that 'definition of insanity' quote at other times which speaks to 'doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results'. This is what Cafasso does, so I think it's great how he pulls these quotes out and tries to act like he's educated with a degree like..a PHD in Nuclear Physics- when - he barely graduated High School, if he even managed that. We already know that he failed first grade grammar and spelling, if his writing is an indicator.
10-31
Saturday, November 11, 2006
Joe Cafasso appears to be a psychopath
And that is another reason why he is highly dangerous. Prisons are full of people with this personality disorder, one of the reasons many of us have concluded that imprisonment is the only thing that will stop him.Psychopaths live their lives not caring about others' feelings, and showing a complete disregard for any sense of social obligation. This is how Joe Cafasso laughs about the pain he inflicts on others with the harangues from his blog. He is egocentric and lacks any insight or sense of responsibility or consequence, his emotions superficial and shallow, if they exist at all. He displays a breathtaking callousness, cunning manipulative skill, and is purely incapable of forming lasting relationships, let alone of any type of love. The true psychopath exhibits emotion which is mimicking other people's emotions, not something he actually feels. Cafasso shows no impulse control and has a low tolerance for frustration and aggression. He displays no sign of empathy, remorse, anxiety or guilt in relation to his behavior. In short, he is truly devoid of conscience.
That last observation - that he doesn't recognize the risk of being caught, disbelieved or injured as a result of his behavior - will be his complete undoing.Most studies of the psychopath have taken place among prison populations, though it has often been suggested that the psychopath is just as likely to sit on a Board of Directors as behind bars, concealing his true nature behind a well crafted "Mask of Sanity" (also the title of the one of the first definitive studies of psychopathy, written by Hervey M. Cleckley in 1941.)
Cleckley defined psychopathy thus:[7]
- Superficial charm and average intelligence.
- Absence of delusions and other signs of irrational thinking.
- Absence of nervousness or neurotic manifestations.
- Unreliability.
- Untruthfulness and insincerity.
- Lack of remorse or shame.
- Antisocial behavior without apparent compunction.
- Poor judgement and failure to learn from experience.
- Pathological egocentricity and incapacity to love.
- General poverty in major affective reactions.
- Specific loss of insight.
- Unresponsiveness in general interpersonal relations.
- Fantastic and uninviting behavior with drink, and sometimes without.
- Suicide threats rarely carried out.
- Sex life impersonal, trivial, and poorly integrated.
- Failure to follow any life plan.
It has been shown that punishment and behavior modification techniques do not improve the behavior of a psychopath. They have been regularly observed to respond to both by becoming more cunning and hiding their behavior better. It has been suggested that traditional therapeutic approaches actually make them, if not worse, then far more adept at manipulating others and concealing their behavior. They are generally considered to be not only incurable but also untreatable.
Psychopaths also have a markedly distorted sense of the potential consequences of their actions, not only for others, but also for themselves. They do not, for example, deeply recognize the risk of being caught, disbelieved or injured as a result of their behaviour.
10-31
Friday, November 10, 2006
Joe Cafasso motivated by revenge and hate
It's a common psychological profile.
In this case, Joe Cafasso is looking to seek revenge for what he thinks people have done to him in his lonely little world. He's a loner and socially inept, obsessed with his targets and bombards the internet with lies and taunts. Unfortunately, as we've seen in other cases, this stalking behavior can last for years and the intensity of the abuse can increase over time. The abuse initially consists of psychological violence, but we have seen cases where it escalates and eventually culminates in physical violence.
Ego & Power Trip stalkers like Joe Cafasso are the most difficult to guard against. Like a street gang looking for likely victims, these stalker are out to prove that they can terrorize someone, bragging about it to family, friends and acquaintances who might be mortified hearing about it, but understanding the psychology of the man, afraid to show it or raise questions or objections to the behavior. Cafasso is obvlivious to this, he's on a power trip and absolutely delirious over his perceived victories. The ego & power trip stalkers are the bullies online. And they are looking for a fight.
Over time you might find that 'walking away' which is what some people recommend in response to this behavior, simply doesn't work. The only way to confront the Joe Cafasso's of the world is to teach them a lesson by confronting them head on with the lies, fabrications, cowardice, manipulation, extortion, coercion, etc.
Link to audio and transcript of AITM on stalking.
pdf of article on stalking from The Psychologist.
Apparently you would like to see more evidence of this, that's why you're here. Let's take this one as a good example.
From the Hunt for Bin Laden:
“I told [CENSORED]…you should have just used a suppressor and blew him [Jack], blew him away,” Cafasso later said during a meeting in Washington, DC.Apparently, Cafasso and FOX News were upset that CBS 60 Minutes II had obtained captured al-Qaida training footage from the advisor that Cafasso and FOX News had wanted first. Cafasso was willing to go to any lengths to get exclusive FOX coverage, even through an assassination.
His appearance in Outfoxed was not only motivated by his being 'found out' and 'exposed' by the NYT and fired by Fox, but by his failure in getting access to these tapes. This is a common bully behavior trait-claiming ownership of someone else's accomplishments (because he has nothing to show for his pathetic existence).
10-31
Thursday, November 09, 2006
Joe Cafasso: bully extraordinaire
Bullying involves the torment of others through verbal harassment, physical assault, or other more subtle methods of coercion such as manipulation.
This is a behavior that Joe Cafasso hasn't outgrown. That little sentence defining bullying is from Wikipedia's definition, and if the shoe fits, wear it! Cafasso has said outright to people that he wasn't above 'exortion', so it would seem that our friend Joe Cafasso fits this categorization. This observation was made in this post by The Way I Like It.
"If aggressive behaviour is not challenged in childhood, there is a danger that it may become habitual. Indeed, there is research evidence, to indicate that bullying during childhood puts children at risk of criminal behaviour and domestic violence in adulthood."Bullies grow up to commit sexual harrassment in the workplace, to beat their wives, and many times as adults, end up in jail because they haven't learned that this is unacceptable. There is just one solution to this problem, according to victims of this beahvior in school:
What's always worked for me is bullying them back. Bullying doesn't just refer to taking lunch money and beating kids up. It's more like a way in which the idiots demonstrate their "power" over you. I'm a nice guy, but the way I see it is, if someone is going to be a jerk to me, I'm going to be a jerk right back. When I first started getting bullied in elementary, it was over stupid stuff. I got tired of it and eventually I clocked one of the bullies in the face.A bully who attacks other people in order to demonstrate control over them, generally doesn't feel very good about himself, and he does it to make himself feel better. He's learned early on in his life that pinning someone down, whether in a literal or figurative sense, somehow makes him 'all better'; at least temporarily. Now according to the law, you can't just go up and clock someone in the face, but if it's provoked and you're defending yourself, that's completely another matter. If there's a TRO involved, that kind of retaliation isn't often even questioned by law enforcement. Personally, I'd call it 'divine retribution'.
10-31
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Cafasso's greatest hits
Causal Nexus charged me with a simple challenge: Putting up a post showing "Cafasso's Greatest Hits". So here is just a taste, a tease, a tip of the iceberg, in no particular order.
Here are a few pearls of Cafasso wisdom pulled from his OSINT yahoogroup.
Oh that's a real piece of work right there, the "I am a Vietnam Vet" claim, which is now infamous, considering his age and the impossibility of it. How many times do we have to endure watching him make a total fool of himself? Although entertaining, I think this man is extremely dangerous. We make light of it; because it seems beyond comprehension, but it's true, and it's still going on.
You know this game playing of KIHA and NONKHIA just kills me! Like the 58,000 + names on the Wall were all KIA! And they are not. I am a Vietnam Vet and yes I never have appreciated the Pentagons number games. These people are dead because they were placed in Harms Way. I tell this to all who do this with the numbers. Go to the closest war memorial and shout it out, you all did not die in battle! See if that makes anyone feel any better.
BTW, for those interesed, www.iraqbodycount.org these numebrs
are pretty accurate.............
This one is a goody:
Franz,He just attended a bio weapons conference? Good God. And 'we all need to be doing a better job of educating the public'...??? When you realize who this man is that's writing this, don't you find yourself holding onto your chair convulsing with uncontrollable laughter?
Good to hear from you, my dearest friend, long time pal, ole buddy of mine! The German Government really has to stop freely handing out Clozapine! I think Lithium is much more stable.
I posted this as an example of exaggerated claims with regard to nukes, radiation and bio warfare. I just attended a BW (Bio Weapons) conference in NYC over the weekend and let me tell you I had to just shake my head. Much of this is really not understood which include radiation issues and all of these are still not understood by the Press. A lot of the confusion comes from those who are part of our community and survive on the "fear factor" and government grants.
I do not wish to underplay any potential terrorist act, but it seems many have lost the common sense approach to this. Currently in this Country right now a Ricin attack occurred in Washington. Watch how this is overplayed, like big time by the press.
I for one am sick and tired of web sites such as the ones I listed who pump more garbage into the public domain. I become even more alarmed when I get e-mails from the local law enforcement community wanting to know whether this information is true or tells me that sites like these give them more information than our own government.
Let me tell you what I believe is the biggest terrorist weapon of mass destruction. Fear and panic. After that conventional weapons, then nukes and dirty bombs, then bio weapons to some degree and then chemical weapons.
The hype out there is terrible and while I post some of this I also "act" to get web sites on the Fed's Radar Screen.
We all need to be doing better job of educating the public to the real threats, not just talking about them.
Gerry
Let's have a few more, then I'll put this to bed.
He said...
"I can put your body where no one can find it."In Rutenberg's piece he said:
"I left because I had enough; I don't like the press."Another joke! And finally, Cafasso's famous last words: this priceless Cafasso quote from the end of the Rutenberg piece.
Hysterical!"...I will not be tried by the press and small-minded individuals such as these that have no clue to what is real or not."
10-31
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Joe Cafasso and the Clipper Ship story
Believe it or not, in addition to his considerable bs on the military, he's got another 'claim to fame' which is affection for clipper ships and the history involved in them.We have to consider the air, the ambiance, of the beautiful Newport area before we go on. The sprawling mansions, the incredible yachts and sailing boats, and.... Bannister's Wharf. It is at Bannister's Wharf where Joe Cafasso's clipper ship was being outfitted and modernized and undergoing an overhaul, according to Joe. This is a story he loved to tell, and which many people were witnesses to. You just have to give credit where credit is due. Giovanna raised a boy who turned into a man that never outgrew a child's active imagination.
Dream on, Joe...you never owned the sprawling home in Newport overlooking the Atlantic - although I'm sure that tale raised som
e eyebrows and impressed people. You never even owned the place in Normandy, France, you said you had, either. And you never had a 1940's clipper - named NUKEATER at Bannister's Wharf, either.You might have had ties to a "law firm" in Warwick, but that might have been because of Uncle Angelo, the man who pled guilty to conspiracy to commit extortion in addition to actual extortion charges.
As to your claim of going to Brown University, that was your father, not you. For some reason I feel as though I'm in the movie "psycho" with Cafasso playing the Anthony Perkins character.
So...remember your 1940's era clipper boat - the one that was moored at Bannisters? You know, for those who are interested in the truth (and it's apparent that science fiction writer Kathryn Cramer and Robert Pelton among others are not)- it's very easy to stop and check that story out. We interviewed the management at Bannisters and all the other adjacent docks and these men are real boat lovers and they would have known if a 1940's clipper was there. Then you emailed around a picture of the boat! It was very easy to verify that this entire fantasy was as fake as the day is long.
Joe Cafasso is an amazingly cunning liar with venom and hate for the world. So twisted, he gives a bad name to pretzels and sailing knots!
10-31
Monday, November 06, 2006
L'État, c'est moi
The Belmont Club mentioned Shadow Company, the schlockumentary by Nick Bicanic and Jason Bourque, in this post of early September entitled, in English, "I am the State". Shadow Company is in line with stalinesque propaganda, which resonates in view of the men who produced that film. Bicanic graduated Cambridge with a degree in chemistry. What this has to do with film making is beyond me, but he has been dubbed a talented young fledgling film maker by Mother Jones. Bourque, as far as I can tell, directed a science fiction action film called "Game Over" which came out in 2003, starring Yasmine Bleeth. Bourque's flair for and interest in science fiction is revealing, considering who some of the more visible players are in this project. I'd like to make a few points and observations regarding some of what I've read on the subject.Chester makes an interesting point which is lost on these people:
The privatization of the War on Terror has been a de facto development, not a de jure one. A brief glance at the growth of privatizing war in this new century suggests that the market is responding to business start-ups’ rule # 1: “Find a need and fill it.”But Capitalism is a difficult concept for french communists. Or American ones. Supply and demand? They don't know what that is.
Wretchard observes in comments:
The State monopoly on the use of violence to enforce justice, like all monopolies, is tolerable only for as long as it works reasonably well. When it begins to fail due to political correctness or inefficiency, a black market for security will emerge. People who have followed Iraq the Model will note how "neighborhood patrols" soon begin to emerge where the state is perceived as being unable to provide security. The "Minutemen" on the southern border derives largely from the perception that the border patrol has failed.I found particularly noteworthy among the observations made in that brief post at Belmont Club entitled L'État, c'est moi, that the 'solid interviews' were with "industry insiders/pundits/analysts" like Robert Pelton. That in itself is shocking, taking into consideration that he is one of those journalists constructing stories from the comfort of a hotel room sometimes even in another country, rather than on the front lines, which is where he is purported to be. This is a journalist's illusion. But that isn't anything new, that is the way journalists do it today. Very few are actually imbedded with soldiers, they're more interested in interviewing terrorists. What the Belmont Club forgot to mention in the 'solid interview' reference was the collaboration with Kathryn Cramer, the science fiction writer, that took place on that project. Ms. Cramer has now somehow morphed into a military affairs expert! This is a woman who has never been around someone in uniform..unless it was a bellhop at the Fairmont Hotel, or room service.
Hamstringing law enforcement with PC rules then reacting to the resulting public disappointment with magisterial pronouncements about the sole of legitimacy residing in the state has the effect of disempowering those who would trust the state and empowering those who would subvert it. Hence the bizarre phenomenon of laws which only restrict the law abiding, while scofflaws are more less left to scoff.
On an international scale the result is Darfur, where only the sleeping lifeguard is authorized to save the drowning man who, though capable of swimming, is prohibited from doing so.
Does this somehow relate to her illicit relationship with Joe Cafasso aka Gerry Blackwood? It does. It has to do with Cafasso's relationship with both of them, he merely received a few extra perks out of his relationship with Kathryn Cramer. Here we have a few examples of military shockumentaries, and books, based on political idealogy, international law and the UN's view that nobody has the right to defend themselves, in addition to the 'expert advice' of Cafasso, aka Gerry Blackwood, who has a Yankee White military clearance-a designation for direct access to the Whitehouse. Not that they'd ever bother to check it out, of course, but it throws a light on the question: what kind of research do these people actually do when they don't vet their sources?
But back to the duplicity demonstrated in "Shadow Company". The Belmont Club observed in that post:
Going by recent events in Lebanon, Hezbollah has achieved a stature and de-facto recognition that many states would envy. It's funny how Hezbollah and other terrorist groups, though receiving money and training from states to attack other states (called "proxy warfare") are never referred to as "mercenaries".A sad fact that is never made mention of in that film, of course. These people don't know a thing about military strategy. Not to mention their books, which were based on their un-named source-the military and counterterrorism 'expert' Joe Cafasso. Of course they would never admit that they knew he was Cafasso. They thought he was Gerry Blackwood! Who doesn't even exist!
There are several points that were made here with regard to who was involved in that project, the experts, and their credentials in the field of privatized warfare. I will close with this observation made at Hell has come with it:
Pelton writes a book about contract military soldiers, mercenaries, and infamous "characters," based on all his lengthy experience in the Afghan and Iraq war zones. Problem is that Pelton's extensive experience, like Cramer's, is mostly in science fiction. But Pelton's con is a little more polished. At least Pelton actually flies into the war zone, and stays just long enough to snap some photos, take some hair-raising video, and head back to a safe hotel in another country to write his vivid front line battle stories. Pelton had a good thing going, until Cramer convinced him to use Colonel Blackwood as a primary source for his new book. Un-named of course, after all, you have to keep those secret CIA, Special Forces, Delta Force, Ranger, Navy SEAL, spook sources highly confidential. Heck, if you didn't do that, someone might just call you and tell you that your source, Colonel Blackwood, was in reality Colonel Cafasso, who was in reality, a private in the US Army, who was thrown out for unsuitable service after a mere 44 days. On the other hand, it's more time that either Cramer or Pelton had in the army, or the navy, or the coast guard, or even as cooks for anyone in a real uniform.Cafasso himself said as Gerry Blackwood: